Teacher-facing AI · Grades 5-11 · Private schools and tutoring programs
AI shouldn't think for students.
It should help teachers understand how students think.
New York City just paused student-facing AI for 600,000 kids. Norway banned it for ages 6-13. The schools that win the next five years won't put AI in front of students. They'll put it behind the teacher.
- Assess
- Identify gaps
- Detect misconceptions
- Reteach
- Verify mastery
Live at GrowWise School since 2026 · 50 students · 4 teachers · Fully built, not a prototype.
The number you're not tracking
$237,000
That's what the average private school loses to attrition every year. And you don't see it coming.
Average school: ~180 students. Average attrition: ~10%. That's 18 families a year × $13,183 average tuition. Gone.
| Why families actually leave | Share of departing families |
|---|---|
| Academic dissatisfaction | 17% |
| Wanted more personalization | 11% |
Nearly a third leave for a reason you could have fixed, if you'd known which student was stuck, on what, before the family decided.
By the time a teacher discovers a gap today, it's already compounded across three weeks of instruction. By the time a parent finds out, they're touring the school down the road.
Sources: Private School Review 2024-25 (tuition); Finalsite (size, attrition); Qualtrics parent survey (reasons for leaving); Cato Institute 2025: 32% of private schools reported enrollment decline in 2024-25.
Why every AI pitch you've heard went nowhere
They all put AI in front of your students. That's the part that gets banned.
Student-facing AI triggers the safety review, the parent consent forms, the board conversation, and now the moratoriums. It also doesn't work: Stanford researchers describe a "performance cliff" when the tool is taken away. The gain was on the screen, not in the student.
Student-facing AI
- Does the thinking for the child
- Blocked by NYC, Norway, most policies
- Requires consent, training, policy change
- Homework stops being evidence
Teacher-facing AI
- Student still reads, writes, solves, struggles
- Compatible with every student-facing ban
- No student rollout. No consent forms.
- Teacher knows exactly who's stuck and why
Omnix360 never talks to a student. It runs on the assessment evidence your program already produces and hands each teacher one thing: the specific misconception blocking each student, and what to teach next.
What you get
Everything a program needs to stop losing families to "we didn't know."
The instructional loop
Assess, identify gaps, detect misconceptions, recommend intervention, reteach, verify mastery. Runs every cycle, on every student, without a teacher building a spreadsheet.
Catches gaps in the same lesson cycle, not at report cards
Misconception-level diagnosis
Not "62% on fractions." Which fraction error. Whether it's actually a place-value gap from two grades back. Which four students share it and should be regrouped.
Every teacher override makes the next diagnosis sharper
Live parent dashboard
Topic-level strengths and weaknesses, updated continuously. Parents stop being the last to know. The 17% who leave over "academics" see the work happening.
Recover ~$118,000/year at a 5-point attrition reduction
Teacher hours back
Manual tracking, gap diagnosis, and parent updates come off the teacher's plate. Teachers average 49 hrs/week; 53% report burnout; replacing one costs $12K-$25K.
Est. 6-10 hours/week per teacher · one retained teacher = $12K-$25K
Runs on its own LMS today
Use the built-in LMS now. LTI 1.3 tool launches for Canvas, Google Classroom, and Schoology are on the roadmap (Next), not available in the current product.
No LMS purchase required · LTI 1.3 is Next, not now
No LMS? We bring one.
Built-in LMS fallback, so "we'd need to buy a system first" is never the blocker.
Zero infrastructure prerequisite
Founder-led onboarding
One session with your teaching team. That's the whole rollout, because there is nothing to roll out to students.
One session · live in days
The math
What you gain vs. what it costs you to try.
Gain · every year, compounding
| Attrition recovery (5-pt reduction) | $118,000 |
| One teacher retained | $12K-$25K |
| Teacher hours freed (4 teachers) | ~1,900 hrs |
| Conservative total | ~$130,000/yr |
Pain · one time
| LMS migration | $0 |
| Student rollout / consent | $0 |
| Hardware / servers | $0 |
| Teacher onboarding | 1 session |
| Subscription | Per student |
You're already spending $237,000 a year on attrition you can't see. This costs less than one student's tuition to implement. The gain is permanent. The pain is one-time. The ratio is more than ten to one.
Scoped pilot
Run it on your real students. Then decide with your scorecard.
Agree baseline metrics and success thresholds first. Use the built-in LMS (LTI 1.3 for an existing LMS is roadmap work). One onboarding session. Your teachers run their normal assessments on an invitation-only pilot cohort.
The "name the blocker" guarantee
If at scorecard review your teachers cannot name the specific misconception blocking every student in the pilot cohort, you owe nothing and we close the pilot workspace.
Three pilot programs this fall.
The founders run every onboarding personally. That caps how many programs we can take before January. When the three are filled, the next cohort opens in 2027.
Proof, not promises
We didn't build this in a pitch deck. We built it in a school.
50
students on the platform at GrowWise School, Dublin, CA
4
teachers running the loop in grades 5-11, classes of 10-12
GrowWise School is our affiliated live lab in Dublin, CA. Omnix360 has run there every day since early 2026. Pathways is an independent tutoring program on the same platform. When you plug in, you are plugging into something that already works, not a prototype.
Urgency you already feel: NAEP 2024 put 33% of 8th graders below basic in reading (worst in 30 years) and 39% below basic in math. Grades 3-8 students average half a grade level behind in both. Gaps compound every term.
What directors ask us
The objections, answered.
We've looked at AI tools before and they never stuck.
Every one of them put AI in front of your students. This one doesn't. The safety objection that killed those conversations doesn't apply, and there's nothing to roll out to a classroom.
What if it doesn't work for us?
That is what the scoped pilot is for. Written thresholds first, then your students, your assessments, your teachers. You decide at scorecard review before any commercial commitment.
We don't have budget.
You're losing ~$237,000 a year to attrition. Omnix360 costs less than one student's annual tuition to implement, per-student, no capital expense.
Our teachers don't have time for another platform.
Teachers keep their current instructional workflow. Omnix360 can run on its built-in LMS today and takes tracking, gap diagnosis, and parent updates off their plate.
Does this comply with NYC-style AI restrictions?
Yes. Those policies restrict student-facing generative AI. Omnix360 never interacts with a student. It's the design those policies explicitly leave room for: AI for instructional planning, behind the teacher.
We don't have an LMS.
Then we bring one. The built-in LMS fallback means there's no prerequisite purchase.
Is teacher-facing AI built for tutoring centers?
Yes. Tutoring centers use it so every tutor sees the same misconception-level evidence, parents see named skill progress before renewal, and directors can tell which tutors close gaps.
Is teacher-facing AI built for private schools?
Yes. Private schools use it to see academic risk months before re-enrollment: which students are slipping on which skills, with a reteach plan the teacher approves.
Does Omnix360 connect to Canvas or Google Classroom today?
Not yet via LTI. The product includes a built-in LMS now. LTI 1.3 tool launches for Canvas, Google Classroom, and Schoology are labeled Next on the integrations roadmap.
Stop finding out at report-card time.
One onboarding session. Invitation-only pilot on your real cohort. Your teachers will know, for every student, what is blocking them and what to teach next before you commit.
Omnix360 is instructional infrastructure by GrowWise. Teacher-facing only; the AI never interacts with students. Figures: Private School Review 2024-25; Finalsite; Qualtrics; Cato Institute 2025; Learning Policy Institute 2024; RAND 2025; NAEP 2024; Education Recovery Scorecard 2025; NYC Mayor's Office, Sept 2, 2026; Reuters, June 19, 2026 (Norway); Christian Science Monitor, Aug 7, 2026 (Stanford "performance cliff"). Attrition-recovery and hours-saved figures are modeled estimates.